Is Hyperaemia Essential for Accurate Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity?

Journal
Article on Is Hyperaemia Essential for Accurate Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity?

Add this Moment to your Passport

Learn from this moment and keep it forever.
FREE
Add To Passport

Overview

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) requires the use of maximal hyperaemia as described in the original preclinical and clinical validation studies and subsequent practice changing randomized controlled trials. A perception that the need for hyperaemia (usually induced with adenosine) was one of the obstacles to more widespread adoption of FFR has led to interest in the use of resting non-hyperaemic indices to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses. We examine the current evidence base and conclude that resting indices agree with FFR in only 80 % of lesions when a binary cut-off is employed but closer to 90 % when hybrid strategies utilising both resting indices and FFR are utilised. It seems counter intuitive to sacrifice diagnostic accuracy when in most patients and healthcare systems the induction of hyperaemia with adenosine is safe and emminently affordable.

Featuring

Barry Hennigan -  Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK

Keith Robertson -  Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK

Colin Berry - Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK

Keith Oldroyd  -  Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK

Loading Simple Education